Page 30

Code-of-Conduct-final

DTU Danish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity iii. Supervisors should take measures to ensure that the research carried out by researchers, research trainees, and students under their supervision is conduct-ed in observance of the principles of research integrity and responsible conduct of research. Possible ways of interactions could be e.g. group sessions, one-on-one meet-ings, open dialogue and discussions in class, workshops or feedback focused on research integrity and responsible conduct of research. iv. Institutions are responsible for ensuring that all staff (including guest research-ers) and students involved in research have sufficient knowledge of and receive training in the principles of research integrity and responsible conduct of re-search. DTU departments, centres as well as scientific sections, groups, and offices are responsible for their individual guest researchers and guest students. DTU pursues a critical, but kind debate culture when it comes to research integ-rity and responsible conduct of research. DTU – Technical University of Denmark 30

• Next Page
• Previous Page

• Foreword
• I. Principles of Research Integrity
• II. Responsible Conduct of Research
• 1. Research planning and conduct
• 1.1. Responsibilities
• 1.2. Division of responsibilities
• 2. Data management
• 2.1. Responsibilities
• 2.2. Division of responsibilities
• 3. Publication and communication
• 3.1. Responsibilities
• 3.2. Division of responsibilities
• 4. Authorship
• 4.1. Responsibilities
• 4.2. Division of responsibilities
• 5. Collaborative research
• 5.1. Responsibilities
• 5.2. Division of responsibilities
• 6. Conflicts of interest
• 6.1. Responsibilities
• 6.2. Division of responsibilities
• Authorship conflicts
• PhD student and supervisor(s)
• III. Research integrity teaching, training, and supervision
• 1. Teaching, training, and supervision in the principles of research integrity and responsible conduct of research
• 1.1. Responsibilities
• 1.2. Division of responsibilities
• IV. Research misconduct and breaches of responsible conduct of research
• 1. Breaches of responsible conduct of research
• 1.1. Responsibilities
• 1.2. Division of responsibilities
• Appendix 1– Recommendations for responding to breaches of responsible conduct of research
• 1. Preliminary advice concerning a suspicion of a potential breach
• 2. Investigation of a well-founded suspicion
• 3. Conclusion of the investigation/sanctions
• Appendix 2 – Members of the working group on the Danish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity
• The Ministry of Higher Education and Science
• Members nominated by Universities Denmark
• Member nominated by the Union of Directors of the Sector Research Institutes of Denmark
• Member nominated by the Danish Council for Independent Research
• Member nominated by the Danish Council for Strategic Research
• Secretariat
• Appendix 3 – Bibliography
• Appendix 4 – Members of the DTU working group on implementation of the Danish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity at DTU
• Secretariat

Code-of-Conduct-final
To see the actual publication please follow the link above